1997-12-05 - Re: White House humiliates Louis Freeh in public

Header Data

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
To: Declan McCullagh <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: bd686ded7b4e5a7e9e5eebafcdf8c1db7ef8155bffe1426544e3582facd6e54a
Message ID: <3.0.3.32.19971205103112.006e9f04@popd.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: <v03007800b0ad4cf8f405@[168.161.105.216]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-05 19:01:03 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 6 Dec 1997 03:01:03 +0800

Raw message

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 1997 03:01:03 +0800
To: Declan McCullagh <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: White House humiliates Louis Freeh in public
In-Reply-To: <v03007800b0ad4cf8f405@[168.161.105.216]>
Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19971205103112.006e9f04@popd.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Isn't this great!  I was listening to Leftie Radio the other day,
and they were talking about how Janet Reno wasn't appointing
an independent prosecutor to bust Clinton, and how Louis Freeh
was pushing for it.  (No, not Rush, Pacifica's Democracy Now...)
Maybe this'll push Clinton into dumping Louis.  
Maybe it'll push Congress into dumping Janet.

There are some downsides; it could help Freeh look like a 
more honest guy than he is, or help him get rehired when the
Republicans take over in 2000, and he could pull off some
wiretap busting Clinton, but mostly he just looks disloyal,
which should annoy the Republicans.
				Thanks! 
					Bill
Bill Stewart, stewarts@ix.netcom.com
Regular Key PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF  3C85 B884 0ABE 4639






Thread