From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 21:31:33 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Pasting in From:
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.93.971203145414.558C-100000@shirley>
Message-ID: <ys15ge38w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au> writes:

> > So if the remailers don't support From: pasting, it's no loss.
> > Similarly, for Reply-To: and Sender: and Path: and Received:
> > and maybe a few other occasionally-forged header fields.
>
> There is a good reson to allow peaple to stick there a 'Reply-To:' in.
> This permits replies to be directed to some sort of anon post office box
> or other such mechanisum.

Just a thought: suppose "reply-to" points to a nym listed on a key server and
the entire article is signed with a key for that nym?

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps