From: Antonomasia <ant@notatla.demon.co.uk>
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com
Message Hash: f4157ae795ae800c04a575846643b18e9726f786453318aa7ace07ae953882a3
Message ID: <199712151830.SAA02083@notatla.demon.co.uk>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-15 19:21:42 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 03:21:42 +0800
From: Antonomasia <ant@notatla.demon.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 03:21:42 +0800
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com
Subject: Re: hashcash spam prevention & firewalls
Message-ID: <199712151830.SAA02083@notatla.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>:
> How about this alternative which achieves the same functionality and
> removes the juicy supeona target:
> Turn on hashash database for all mails. That means hashcash gets put
> in the database to prevent double spending. ....
> So now when you reply to a message, on it's way out via the mail hub,
> you remove that hashcash token from the double spending database.
> This means that the sender can cache sent hashcash tokens, and re-use
> them when after he gets a reply.
Doesn't this invite the spammer to Bcc an accomplice with the
target ISP ? The accomplice replies; thereby freeing the coin
for reuse.
> I am told by one subscriber to look at TIS firewall toolkits imap
> program.
You may have meant "smap".
--
##############################################################
# Antonomasia ant@notatla.demon.co.uk #
# See http://www.notatla.demon.co.uk/ #
##############################################################
Return to December 1997
Return to “Antonomasia <ant@notatla.demon.co.uk>”
1997-12-15 (Tue, 16 Dec 1997 03:21:42 +0800) - Re: hashcash spam prevention & firewalls - Antonomasia <ant@notatla.demon.co.uk>