From: bureau42 Anonymous Remailer <nobody@bureau42.ml.org>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: f93237335bedc2314d3b8544fd9fce5a6e6ea792a74239d182a031a288a7108d
Message ID: <1c5bE7t2VZDcs9ZD4AjFLQ==@bureau42.ml.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-05 21:45:12 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 6 Dec 1997 05:45:12 +0800
From: bureau42 Anonymous Remailer <nobody@bureau42.ml.org>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 1997 05:45:12 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <1c5bE7t2VZDcs9ZD4AjFLQ==@bureau42.ml.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Something that I have found irritating about the posts by
> non-persistent identities is that it isn't possible to support a
> meaningful discussion as previous statements can always be repudiated,
> or maybe even weren't made by the particular poster. I compared this
> to sound bites.
And Tim do I know how you hate sound bites. Look at
it this way: no identity is persistent, signed or not.
All just varying degrees.
Maybe all we *ever* had was sound bites, but the
closer proximities and smaller networks of the past
made them seem more dynamic than they really were.
Return to December 1997
Return to “bureau42 Anonymous Remailer <nobody@bureau42.ml.org>”
1997-12-05 (Sat, 6 Dec 1997 05:45:12 +0800) - No Subject - bureau42 Anonymous Remailer <nobody@bureau42.ml.org>