1997-12-05 - No Subject

Header Data

From: bureau42 Anonymous Remailer <nobody@bureau42.ml.org>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: f93237335bedc2314d3b8544fd9fce5a6e6ea792a74239d182a031a288a7108d
Message ID: <1c5bE7t2VZDcs9ZD4AjFLQ==@bureau42.ml.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-05 21:45:12 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 6 Dec 1997 05:45:12 +0800

Raw message

From: bureau42 Anonymous Remailer <nobody@bureau42.ml.org>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 1997 05:45:12 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <1c5bE7t2VZDcs9ZD4AjFLQ==@bureau42.ml.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



> Something that I have found irritating about the posts by
> non-persistent identities is that it isn't possible to support a
> meaningful discussion as previous statements can always be repudiated,
> or maybe even weren't made by the particular poster.  I compared this
> to sound bites.

And Tim do I know how you hate sound bites. Look at
it this way: no identity is persistent, signed or not.
All just varying degrees.

Maybe all we *ever* had was sound bites, but the
closer proximities and smaller networks of the past
made them seem more dynamic than they really were.

     







Thread