1997-12-29 - Re: [NTSEC] SKIPJACK / NT4.0 (SP3?) (fwd)

Header Data

From: David Honig <honig@otc.net>
To: “William H. Geiger III” <sunder@brainlink.com>
Message Hash: fe6fc68bd113aa5915ffbb693bf690b033f3af3b0798a364f7b10063209919be
Message ID: <3.0.5.32.19971229094401.007a7570@otc.net>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.971226114446.17857A-101000@beast.brainlink.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-29 18:06:09 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 02:06:09 +0800

Raw message

From: David Honig <honig@otc.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 02:06:09 +0800
To: "William H. Geiger III" <sunder@brainlink.com>
Subject: Re: [NTSEC] SKIPJACK / NT4.0 (SP3?) (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.971226114446.17857A-101000@beast.brainlink.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19971229094401.007a7570@otc.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 11:12 AM 12/26/97 -0600, William H. Geiger III wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>In <Pine.SUN.3.96.971226114446.17857A-101000@beast.brainlink.com>, on
>12/26/97 
>   at 11:45 AM, Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com> said:
>
>>Now this is interesting! :)  (Either that or JA is smoking crack... - no
>>idea on JA's reputation capital though...)
>
>Well to be honest anyone who would trust the M$ crypto API get what they
>deserve.
>
>

Is this just random MS-baiting or do you have a real point re the API?

The API describes an interface to things you'd need for a cryptosystem.
I believe it is up to implementors to instantiate the functions appropriately.


------------------------------------------------------------
      David Honig                   Orbit Technology
     honig@otc.net                  Intaanetto Jigyoubu

"Windows 95 is a technologically complex product that is best left alone by
the government..."
 ---MSFT Atty B. Smith

















Thread