1998-01-16 - Re: e-mail muddling.
Header Data
From: “wabe” <wabe@smart.net>
To: <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 0b592f5eabef39903e0b0a69aa3c3124e7e4ec173a8a5b8229051142c5c930b0
Message ID: <008801bd22cf$131ec440$ab8588d1@justice>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-16 19:55:55 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 03:55:55 +0800
Raw message
From: "wabe" <wabe@smart.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 03:55:55 +0800
To: <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: e-mail muddling.
Message-ID: <008801bd22cf$131ec440$ab8588d1@justice>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
--
Also wouldn't it be easier to de-muddle an e-mail
message than a brute force attack? I mean,
you KNOW what muddled it. And you know
the general way it got muddled. It's not pgp,
it's just some line breaks a bit too early for their
time...
-wabe
--digsig
EojdyErVslc/s6aQeIHwnOlMw3lUKJhdZc/ZeCNfe7H
zvMubhARmsdOWVOYi7Su/Y9qnSIOIjc9Wuqb6G5G
40asyOJEF0Kflm3y9623Ab0qCaryGJ1TtAaE4JU1y
Thread
Return to January 1998
- Return to “Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>”
Return to ““wabe” <wabe@smart.net>”
- 1998-01-16 (Sat, 17 Jan 1998 03:55:55 +0800) - Re: e-mail muddling. - “wabe” <wabe@smart.net>
- 1998-01-18 (Mon, 19 Jan 1998 06:02:30 +0800) - Re: e-mail muddling. - Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>