From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Message Hash: 0ff9ef81a1a2b4aefd637c734491eae468f228728b20c2888d35a04112d65a38
Message ID: <199801261945.NAA28522@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-26 19:48:59 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 03:48:59 +0800
From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 03:48:59 +0800
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Subject: Re: Video & cryptography... (fwd)
Message-ID: <199801261945.NAA28522@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
Forwarded message:
> From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
> Subject: Re: Video & cryptography...
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 13:56:57 -0500 (EST)
> Schneier, Wagner and Kelsey have done some work on an authenticating
> camera.
>
> One issue to be concerned with is that what the camera sees is not
> always the truth. Putting a film set together to film bigfoot is
> easy. The fact that the film is authenticated as having come from the
> camera doesn't mean a whole lot in some cases.
Doesn't this same sort of issue arise from any other digital signature
process then? There should be nothing fundamentaly different between the
characteristics of a video camera signing a frame than a person signing
email.
____________________________________________________________________
| |
| The most powerful passion in life is not love or hate, |
| but the desire to edit somebody elses words. |
| |
| Sign in Ed Barsis' office |
| |
| _____ The Armadillo Group |
| ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA |
| /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ |
| .', |||| `/( e\ |
| -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate |
| ravage@ssz.com |
| 512-451-7087 |
|____________________________________________________________________|
Return to January 1998
Return to “Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>”