1998-01-16 - Legality of faxed signatures.

Header Data

From: “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 15fd13cf93456b02fb9a486a3b0b26ea0a7b5d5f42eb57721340692c536a9a57
Message ID: <199801161807.KAA28571@proxy3.ba.best.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-16 18:22:07 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 02:22:07 +0800

Raw message

From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 02:22:07 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Legality of faxed signatures.
Message-ID: <199801161807.KAA28571@proxy3.ba.best.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



    --
I believe that there is case law or legislation that a faxed
signature is worthless if it is bit for bit identical with
another signature, which of course it usually is these days.

Can anyone with a spot of legal knowledge give me something
impressive sounding to scare people who rely on those
signatures.





    --digsig
         James A. Donald
     6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
     m3FpGHzBYajbGdNyApmYfwBYZOzY44LHPv7+KZPs
     4hFtbEu745IQyZxamC5p6PUwCCpOVAo/LKzZD8Uqu
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because of 
the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this right, 
not from the arbitrary power of the state.

http://www.jim.com/jamesd/






Thread