From: Alan Olsen <alan@clueserver.org>
To: “Nobuki Nakatuji” <bd1011@hotmail.com>
Message Hash: 1bd47fc208ce613dc1a68ccfa1a4f9bccc2caaf41fc2210d400e1ee09d5edd35
Message ID: <3.0.5.32.19980104232746.00b28760@clueserver.org>
Reply To: <19980105070034.3946.qmail@hotmail.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-05 07:47:57 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 5 Jan 1998 15:47:57 +0800
From: Alan Olsen <alan@clueserver.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 1998 15:47:57 +0800
To: "Nobuki Nakatuji" <bd1011@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Is FEAL developed by NTT safe?
In-Reply-To: <19980105070034.3946.qmail@hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19980104232746.00b28760@clueserver.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 11:00 PM 1/4/98 PST, Nobuki Nakatuji wrote:
>
>Is FEAL developed by NTT safe? Where isn't safe if it is here because it
>isn't safe?
>From what I have read, FEAL is the punching bag of the cryptographic
community. It has been broken many times by many people at many different
number of rounds. (It seems to be the one that many cryptanalists have cut
their teeth on.)
The history of FEAL does not inspire a whole lot of confidence, no matter
who is selling it.
---
| "That'll make it hot for them!" - Guy Grand |
|"The moral PGP Diffie taught Zimmermann unites all| Disclaimer: |
| mankind free in one-key-steganography-privacy!" | Ignore the man |
|`finger -l alano@teleport.com` for PGP 2.6.2 key | behind the keyboard.|
| http://www.ctrl-alt-del.com/~alan/ |alan@ctrl-alt-del.com|
Return to January 1998
Return to “Tim May <tcmay@got.net>”