From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Message Hash: 2013c391be3bf7200eea5f0d287ef7003245dea79d77e50842eb1fb649ddb029
Message ID: <199801190401.WAA20181@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-19 03:37:02 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 11:37:02 +0800
From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 11:37:02 +0800
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Subject: Re: NTY compression proposal (fwd)
Message-ID: <199801190401.WAA20181@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
All editing errors are my own, I re-formatted the original text to better
address the points.
Forwarded message:
> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 1998 19:17:32 -0800
> From: Steve Schear <schear@lvdi.net>
> Subject: Re: NTY compression proposal
> Compression efficiency depends upon
> 1) the entropy of the input data
We are looking at selecting 100 64-bit keys out of a set of 2^64,
that is not a lot of opportunity there, given a random key generation
process, for a lot of commen patterns in the key set. If we don't have a
lot of commen patterns in the text we don't get a lot of compression.
> 2) the allowable losses
In this case we can't afford any loss.
> 3) finding an efficient algorithm to code for that entropy.
Which if we do the math requires something in the neighborhood of 33:1,
for a loss-less algorithm that's a pretty hurky boundary condition.
> I think I'm on fairly firm ground assuming that key data entropy is very=
> high and therefore little or no compressible is feasible.
My point exactly, which would lead us to the conclusion that our requirement
of a 33:1 compression factor is not realizable.
____________________________________________________________________
| |
| The most powerful passion in life is not love or hate, |
| but the desire to edit somebody elses words. |
| |
| Sign in Ed Barsis' office |
| |
| _____ The Armadillo Group |
| ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA |
| /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ |
| .', |||| `/( e\ |
| -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate |
| ravage@ssz.com |
| 512-451-7087 |
|____________________________________________________________________|
Return to January 1998
Return to “Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>”
1998-01-19 (Mon, 19 Jan 1998 11:37:02 +0800) - Re: NTY compression proposal (fwd) - Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>