From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
To: ravage@ssz.com
Message Hash: 260f3c0eb74249224d108efae9b5b54ece6f90981d8e656f8c2ae255da782ccf
Message ID: <199801140033.AAA00495@server.eternity.org>
Reply To: <199801122044.OAA22802@einstein.ssz.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-14 00:41:42 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 08:41:42 +0800
From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 08:41:42 +0800
To: ravage@ssz.com
Subject: plan 9 features (Re: autonomous agents (fwd))
In-Reply-To: <199801122044.OAA22802@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <199801140033.AAA00495@server.eternity.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com> writes:
> > Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
> > > [autonomous agents, markets for CPU time, disk, comms]
>
> Has anyone done any work that you are aware of under the Plan 9 os?
> With it's fundamental seperation of i/o, process, and file servers
> along with it's inherent bidding/scheduling mechanism it seems to me
> that a lot of this work has already been done. In addition there are
> programs that allow Linux boxes to participate as Plan 9 compliant
> file servers.
Sounds interesting. I am not familiar with plan 9 besides the
enthusings of a colleague reminiscing about the work done at York
Univ, UK with plan 9.
Java has a lot going for it as a candidate due to portability and code
distribution support. I think the only thing missing from java is the
bidding and scheduling mechanisms. Your other forwarded message on
plan 9 looks interesting also.
Adam
Return to January 1998
Return to “Tim May <tcmay@got.net>”