1998-01-22 - Re: Misty???

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
To: tcmay@got.net
Message Hash: 2b493f7caf038ba4d7709c21159f28dce9519d855c446d9a426417ebe65f6a8e
Message ID: <199801221554.KAA09992@homeport.org>
Reply To: <v03102801b0ec9df81dd5@[207.167.93.63]>
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-22 16:00:57 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 00:00:57 +0800

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 00:00:57 +0800
To: tcmay@got.net
Subject: Re: Misty???
In-Reply-To: <v03102801b0ec9df81dd5@[207.167.93.63]>
Message-ID: <199801221554.KAA09992@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Tim May wrote:
| At 9:08 PM -0800 1/21/98, William H. Geiger III wrote:

| >Any opinions on it?? My only exposure has be through the pidgon-english
| >posts of Nobuki Nakatuji (if it looks like a duck, it smells like a duck,
| >it quacks like a duck ....).
| 
| I wouldn't call Misty "snake oil." But it's also been thoroughly taken
| apart and shown to be weak. Importantly, it was submitted by Mitsubishi for
| peer review.

Could you provide a pointer to the analysis paper?

Adam

ObCypherpunk: I think that 9mm is far superior to .45 due to its lower
recoil.

-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume







Thread