From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 2b97df740ea65bed780597ff45d4f39ed0d940510847b1b20636aea73d368a77
Message ID: <1.5.4.32.19980118233849.0071684c@pop.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-18 23:38:32 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 07:38:32 +0800
From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 07:38:32 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Voice Coding Controls
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19980118233849.0071684c@pop.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
DM notes of the BXA Wassenaar rule for voice coding:
After looking at some of the Wassenaar docs, I was
surprised to see that the CCL wants to regulate speech
encoders that operate at less than 2400 bps. Surprising
because it was encoding, not encryption, that was being
regulated. This is disturbing.
This at first seemed to put some of the Nautilus development
team's software in jeopardy, but I believe that by the letter
of the law (or regulation) that all coders in Nautilus are not
subject to the CCL, as they only go as low as 2400 bps
and not less than.
For citations of voice coding in Category 5 - Telecommunications:
http://jya.com/bxa-wa-cat5.htm#5A001b10
http://jya.com/bxa-wa-cat5.htm#5A991b6a
Return to January 1998
Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”
1998-01-18 (Mon, 19 Jan 1998 07:38:32 +0800) - Voice Coding Controls - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>