From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Message Hash: 38a155777407c0288a7ae586d98f08a9a68f71c7d26731edf1f5fdd86d444378
Message ID: <199801262210.QAA29306@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-26 22:16:18 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 06:16:18 +0800
From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 06:16:18 +0800
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Subject: Re: Video & cryptography... (fwd)
Message-ID: <199801262210.QAA29306@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
Forwarded message:
> From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
> Subject: Re: Video & cryptography... (fwd)
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 17:02:53 -0500 (EST)
> | Doesn't this same sort of issue arise from any other digital signature
> | process then? There should be nothing fundamentaly different between the
> | characteristics of a video camera signing a frame than a person signing
> | email.
>
> It arises in a different context; with a signature on paper,
> you're generally indicating that you've read and consented to whats on
> the paper, not that you created it.
Isn't signing the document at least in theory a participatory creative act?
If you don't sign it then it doesn't exist in the same context as if you do.
Otherwise why have the signature? If I use a camera to sign a digital image
am I not stating that I have viewed and consented to the image being a valid
representation of what the lens saw? Seem quite similar to me.
> The meaning of a camera signing a
> video still is not obvious to me. Is it intended to be 'this is what
> we saw through the lens?' or 'this is what really happened?'
A mechanism to sign a digital image would provide some base protection
against altering the image surreptitously, just as why you sign (and get a
copy) of other documentary evidence.
____________________________________________________________________
| |
| The most powerful passion in life is not love or hate, |
| but the desire to edit somebody elses words. |
| |
| Sign in Ed Barsis' office |
| |
| _____ The Armadillo Group |
| ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA |
| /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ |
| .', |||| `/( e\ |
| -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate |
| ravage@ssz.com |
| 512-451-7087 |
|____________________________________________________________________|
Return to January 1998
Return to “Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>”
1998-01-26 (Tue, 27 Jan 1998 06:16:18 +0800) - Re: Video & cryptography… (fwd) - Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>