From: John Blair <jdblair@frodo.tucc.uab.edu>
To: “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
Message Hash: 47661776dfcfa3132a9bc09a7ea8e09e2f6f8f1e911c4d0f1a1fb355e39dbbd7
Message ID: <199801170006.SAA06076@frodo.tucc.uab.edu>
Reply To: <199801162211.OAA14165@proxy3.ba.best.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-17 00:14:12 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 08:14:12 +0800
From: John Blair <jdblair@frodo.tucc.uab.edu>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 08:14:12 +0800
To: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Subject: Re: Legality of faxed signatures.
In-Reply-To: <199801162211.OAA14165@proxy3.ba.best.com>
Message-ID: <199801170006.SAA06076@frodo.tucc.uab.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Any lawyers on this list may want to correct me, but as I understand
it contract law is *extremely* flexible concerning what a "signature"
is. It is perfectly legal to negotiate a contract via conventional,
plaintext e-mail. If you wrote a contract for me to sign and I wrote
back "I accept this contract" then legally a contract would exist.
This is the same as if you phoned me, described a problem, and agreed
to pay me to solve the problem. Legally a contract would exist
(though it would be foolish not to put the contract in writing in
most situations). The law is concerned more with the ritual of
forming the contract (preferably by writing it on some medium that
can be examined at a later date) followed by some sort of record that
both parties agree on the contract they formed. In fact, businesses
work like this all the time. The reason it works is that the best
way to enforce a contract is to *trust* the person you're forming a
contract with.
Obviously, just negotiating a contract via e-mail is dangerous. All
of us know there are ways to forge or repudiate parts or all of this
transaction. A paper signature, just like a digital signature, is an
excellent tool for non-repudiation (You say: I didn't sign that!
Your opponent says: we know you signed this b/c this is your
handwriting/public key/etc). Whether or not it seems to be a good
idea from the viewpoint of computer science is irrelevant-- the law
focuses on the *ritual,* not the specific form of the document.
Note-- I'm deriving this statement from a study that I did on digital
signatures in contract law that was part of my undergraduate thesis.
I am not a legal expert. If I am totally off-base please explain to
me where I am wrong so I may revise my notions concerning contract
law.
......................................................................
. .
.....John.D.Blair... mailto:jdblair@uab.edu phoneto:205.975.7123 .
. http://frodo.tucc.uab.edu faxto:205.975.7129 .
..sys|net.admin.... .
. the university computer center .....
..... g.e.e.k.n.i.k...the.university.of.alabama.at.birmingham....
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNL/2AQJjTpK3AXhBAQHJMgQAoPZfME2lyEm29ipy8CMGmt32RXhERF0D
1WyEMP+dxkcDb8LkgYwPYZZp8pAEac2Qd8puET3S6tJajj452TEPelfyKeKfMFva
yFyWowFBON+R2AJT1HMXL2ArevRqTpbKD3mdjZ/qtWBbEf8Dh+gNoU0E+CoTbiEq
0lgp0nIrW9o=
=I5Jy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to January 1998
Return to “John Blair <jdblair@frodo.tucc.uab.edu>”