From: Mark Rogaski <wendigo@ne-wendigo.jabberwock.org>
To: tcmay@got.net (Tim May)
Message Hash: 4a013f1f095b92119cc13e6379622498c3a94cd0a1501640f3ddce60b1f1ca7c
Message ID: <199801160534.AAA25032@deathstar.jabberwock.org>
Reply To: <v03102801b0e479088e30@[207.167.93.63]>
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-16 05:50:05 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 13:50:05 +0800
From: Mark Rogaski <wendigo@ne-wendigo.jabberwock.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 13:50:05 +0800
To: tcmay@got.net (Tim May)
Subject: Re: Personal webpages can get you fired [CNN]
In-Reply-To: <v03102801b0e479088e30@[207.167.93.63]>
Message-ID: <199801160534.AAA25032@deathstar.jabberwock.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
An entity claiming to be Tim May wrote:
:
: And as with the AOL case of Timothy McVeigh (no, not _that_ one) being
: kicked out of the Navy for labelling himself as "gay" and as a "boy hunter"
: on one of his AOL profiles, there are already calls for new privacy laws.
:
: Which misses the point. By illegalizing the keeping or disclosing of
: lawfully obtained information, greater harm is done.
:
: I heard Nadine Strossen of the ACLU arguing today that more laws are needed
: to "prevent" these "abuses." In fact, more _technology_ is what's needed.
: The technology of Web proxies, remailers, nyms, and such.
:
This issue was covered in _The Right to Privacy_ by Ellen Alderman and
Carolyn Kennedy. The book was misplaced during my recent move, and I didn't
get very far through it. I do remember that the current legal standard for
invasion of privacy depended upon whether the information was gathered from
a public medium. A psychiatric evaluation or Telco records would not be
considered a public forum, so could not be used by an employer (unless the
evaluation was given by the employer, I guess). A web page, on the other hand
is about as public as you can get.
I would agree that with the right technologies (proxies, remailers, etc) there
would be a de facto protection of privacy, and (insert the not-even-close-to-
a-lawyer disclaimer here) that there should be some legal basis that since
the effort was made to hide the True Name, the content could not be used, if
there were a compromise. Looks like a win-win.
It still doesn't deal with morons who *provide* their employers with the
ammo to terminate employment. You can make a system foolproof, but you can't
make it damnfoolproof.
Mark
- --
[] Mark Rogaski "That which does not kill me
[] wendigo@pobox.com only makes me stranger."
[]
[] finger wendigo@deathstar.jabberwock.org for PGP key
[] anti spambot: postmaster@localhost abuse@localhost uce@ftc.gov
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQEVAwUBNL7xbXzbrFts6CmBAQG6YQgAhywAsGpbDIBY/5h/KSLG+C4BdpYuqIOD
Gg1Zy/05gB02+Ap2o7YOpx5pP92iG4uWnYNlUcq6tf+83atd5Y0fvHEnuS5GinQX
mdZ8HqZMNR/XaVH+J/BLWcWPjWWGYnI7Zms/3VFvE5tA+0KVX3lKBqpTiCRCOIZi
pqInONdqo1derBidHiM0KEcfZJ6zwecaS164NgmKI7/+akDSauK/ja44sKc+4bLI
Qfaamrm9pXPKNvc+WOMMNzjNpwzqemfpobDsB3morIcn/eJa/1sE3H2NwnMKvOLY
bNhXjfj9P5FNiMqJMHeKMX0vVJGPp3B72y0QEJwpaR5LHst792KF1w==
=WPJ3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to January 1998
Return to “Tim May <tcmay@got.net>”