1998-01-07 - Re: Is FEAL developed by NTT safe?
Header Data
From: “Nobuki Nakatuji” <bd1011@hotmail.com>
To: daw@cs.berkeley.edu
Message Hash: 50a82fabbc18ae5ac81570a143dabe3651c5b7a70369369578171d08d5c33279
Message ID: <19980107020417.23803.qmail@hotmail.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-07 02:20:02 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 7 Jan 1998 10:20:02 +0800
Raw message
From: "Nobuki Nakatuji" <bd1011@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 1998 10:20:02 +0800
To: daw@cs.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: Is FEAL developed by NTT safe?
Message-ID: <19980107020417.23803.qmail@hotmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>
>In article <19980105070034.3946.qmail@hotmail.com> you write:
>> Is FEAL developed by NTT safe? Where isn't safe if it is here because
it
>> isn't safe?
>
>FEAL is dead; I wouldn't ever use it in any new product.
>Use triple-DES instead.
>
What kind of method was FEAL decoded in?
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Thread
Return to January 1998
- Return to “Alan Olsen <alan@clueserver.org>”
Return to ““Nobuki Nakatuji” <bd1011@hotmail.com>”
- 1998-01-07 (Wed, 7 Jan 1998 10:20:02 +0800) - Re: Is FEAL developed by NTT safe? - “Nobuki Nakatuji” <bd1011@hotmail.com>
- 1998-01-07 (Wed, 7 Jan 1998 14:07:19 +0800) - Re: Is FEAL developed by NTT safe? - Alan Olsen <alan@clueserver.org>