1998-01-13 - Should police knock before entering - SC to decide [CNN]

Header Data

From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Message Hash: 59fabd7f7ebfebea17200e31347ac10cf5d9b39b16192fb49ecec06fe848e32e
Message ID: <199801132128.PAA28732@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-13 21:40:00 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 05:40:00 +0800

Raw message

From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 05:40:00 +0800
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Subject: Should police knock before entering - SC to decide [CNN]
Message-ID: <199801132128.PAA28732@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text



Forwarded message:

>            SUPREME COURT CASE: SHOULD POLICE KNOCK BEFORE ENTERING?
>                                        
>      SCOTUS graphic January 13, 1998
>      Web posted at: 2:14 p.m. EST (1914 GMT)
>      
>      WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Supreme Court was being asked Tuesday to
>      decide whether law enforcement officers should ring the doorbell or
>      knock before entering a building if they sense danger.
>      
>      The case focuses on a 1994 incident in Oregon. Hernan Ramirez fired
>      his gun after police broke in his garage window after they received
>      a tip that a fugitive was in the Ramirez house. It was a tip that
>      turned out to be wrong.
>      
>      Ramirez fired his gun without knowing that those intruding were law
>      officers, and once he realized who the intruders were he
>      surrendered.
>      
>      "The police fire back a fusillade of fire, screaming 'police!
>      police!' -- this is the first time Mr. Ramirez realizes that the
>      police are there," said public defender Michael R. Levine.
>      
>      Even though Ramirez was not the fugitive that police had been
>      looking for, they still arrested Ramirez on weapons charges since,
>      as a convicted felon, he was not permitted to possess a gun.
>      
>      A federal judge later ruled that the police search had been
>      unconstitutional. The federal government then brought the case to
>      the Supreme Court, arguing that the increased danger in that
>      particular case had warranted the window-shattering no-knock entry
>      into the Ramirez building.

[text deleted]


    ____________________________________________________________________
   |                                                                    |
   |      Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make       |
   |      violent revolution inevitable.                                |
   |                                                                    |
   |                                          John F. Kennedy           |
   |                                                                    |
   |                                                                    | 
   |            _____                             The Armadillo Group   |
   |         ,::////;::-.                           Austin, Tx. USA     |
   |        /:'///// ``::>/|/                     http://www.ssz.com/   |
   |      .',  ||||    `/( e\                                           |
   |  -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-                         Jim Choate       |
   |                                                 ravage@ssz.com     |
   |                                                  512-451-7087      |
   |____________________________________________________________________|






Thread