1998-01-30 - Re: patent office and key recovery
Header Data
From: ulf@fitug.de (Ulf =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 61042798e33bdc320581627bd67f3e51b93bb7d182954e62bd6189e5b0a4794d
Message ID: <m0xy3TR-0003b8C@ulf.mali.sub.org>
Reply To: <3.0.5.32.19980129053039.00798ae0@popd.ix.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-30 01:38:46 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 09:38:46 +0800
Raw message
From: ulf@fitug.de (Ulf =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 09:38:46 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: patent office and key recovery
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19980129053039.00798ae0@popd.ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <m0xy3TR-0003b8C@ulf.mali.sub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> "The agency wants to include a "key recovery" system in the
> software in case the encryption has to be broken."
>
>The mind boggles.
The Patent Office is obliged to submit all patent applications to the
spooks for review (as patent attorney Axel Horns pointed out on
another list). So there is little "need" for "recovery" even from the
government point of view, other than getting people to use key escrow.
Thread
Return to January 1998
- Return to “Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>”
Return to “ulf@fitug.de (Ulf =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)”
- 1998-01-29 (Thu, 29 Jan 1998 14:14:12 +0800) - patent office and key recovery - Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>
- 1998-01-30 (Fri, 30 Jan 1998 09:38:46 +0800) - Re: patent office and key recovery - ulf@fitug.de (Ulf =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)