From: "Attila T. Hun" <attila@hun.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 1998 04:08:35 +0800
To: John Young <attila@primenet.com>
Subject: Re: Why This List Is A Security Risk
In-Reply-To: <1.5.4.32.19980131020517.00720848@pop.pipeline.com>
Message-ID: <19980131.194552.attila@hun.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>(4) Any foreign, domestic, or international organization or person
>engaged in analysis, discussion, or publication of material on
>intelligence, defense, foreign affairs, or protected technology.

    that must be why the federal assholes have always denied aps
    for clearance, we are bunch of fucking subversives! <g>
    
    of course, I know better than that:  more than once having
    told representatives of the criminal class that I may sell
    my services on the market, but I am not your, not my,
    government's whore.  
    
    unfortunately, (yeah, right!)  they have taken a dim view of
    me --and most anyone I associate with.  well, fuck 'em if
    they cant take a joke --criticism is part of freedom and 
    when the govcritters figure out they represent us, not 
    own us; and when they stop hypocritically dictating policy 
    to the rest of the world, maybe we'll have something to talk
    about.
    
    and, if that last statement comes true, I'll not only 
    believe in the tooth fairy, but I'll throw in the fairy 
    godmother for a bonus. shit, I'll even toss in a godfather 
    or two...
    
        attila out...  grousing

    === whole text from jya ===

on or about 980130:2105, in <1.5.4.32.19980131020517.00720848@pop.pipeline.com>, 
    John Young <jya@pipeline.com> was purported to have 
    expostulated to perpetuate an opinion:

>Setting policy on national security risk for the entire USG,  the DoD
>proclaims a trustworthy person does not engage in  the following:

>Sec. 147.14  Guideline L--Outside activities.

>    (a) The concern. Involvement in certain types of outside employment
>or activities is of security concern if it poses a conflict with an
>individual's security responsibilities and could create an increased risk
>of unauthorized disclosure of classified information.
>    (b) Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be
>disqualifying include any service, whether compensated, volunteer, or
>employment with: 
>    (1) A foreign country;
>    (2) Any foreign national;
>    (3) A representative of any foreign interest;
>    (4) Any foreign, domestic, or international organization or person
>engaged in analysis, discussion, or publication of material on
>intelligence, defense, foreign affairs, or protected technology.

>-----

>>From 32 CFR Part 147 published today.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: latin1
Comment: No safety this side of the grave. Never was; never will be

iQBVAwUBNNOCwrR8UA6T6u61AQFmvwH/QPMS8SgEbHuwAMDYcTdQe2hkYALuqnyk
3uPGfN1psh7k+saOLFchVVGSpmTriYVPpnM5kKK/RSx/UqCMqLxqmw==
=GBIt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----