1998-01-08 - Re: Question on U.S. Postal Service and crypto (fwd)

Header Data

From: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
To: declan@well.com
Message Hash: 7c0626ccebfa03af81a4965ce576836941436c25442b1dc931b0db66134ba972
Message ID: <3.0.2.32.19980108014945.006c9910@pop.sirius.com>
Reply To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.980108013649.17927B-100000@gabber.c2.net>
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-08 09:52:31 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 17:52:31 +0800

Raw message

From: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 17:52:31 +0800
To: declan@well.com
Subject: Re: Question on U.S. Postal Service and crypto (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.980108013649.17927B-100000@gabber.c2.net>
Message-ID: <3.0.2.32.19980108014945.006c9910@pop.sirius.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



>This is for a story for Time on the "new" U.S .Postal Service. I vaguely
>recall the USPS trying to set digital signature standards and/or serve as
>a CA. I'd like to mention this.
>
>Can't remember the details, though. Does anyone have 'em (or a pointer to
>them) handy?

See <http://www.parrhesia.com/po-ca.html> for information about the USPS'
plan to act as a CA.


--
Greg Broiles                | US crypto export control policy in a nutshell:
gbroiles@netbox.com         | Export jobs, not crypto.
http://www.io.com/~gbroiles | http://www.parrhesia.com






Thread