From: Ian Sparkes <isparkes@q9f47.dmst02.telekom.de>
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com
Message Hash: 7f9cdf17979c550e4993017770fc562c754cd7a740053b098ecc885662a8a081
Message ID: <3.0.2.32.19980109094653.006a7a4c@q9f47.dmst02.telekom.de>
Reply To: <v03110710b0d9f850d94d@[207.94.249.133]>
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-09 09:56:08 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 17:56:08 +0800
From: Ian Sparkes <isparkes@q9f47.dmst02.telekom.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 17:56:08 +0800
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com
Subject: Re: Silly Shrinkwrapped Encryption
In-Reply-To: <v03110710b0d9f850d94d@[207.94.249.133]>
Message-ID: <3.0.2.32.19980109094653.006a7a4c@q9f47.dmst02.telekom.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>Lotus made not secret of their GAK implementation in Notes. If the Swedish
>government bought Notes anyway, they have only themselves and the
>incompetence of their IS people to blame.
>
>Now they have to scrap a recently fielded system. Though luck. Better
>solutions than Notes were out there and easily to be found by the most
>casual buyer.
>
People buy Notes for the databases - the mail is just a freebie for most, a
bit like the radio in your car. The mail's not even very good (adequate at
most).
Anyone know if the databases are encrypted with the same GAK scheme?
Return to January 1998
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>”