1998-01-08 - Re: Remailers & N.E.T.

Header Data

From: “Robert A. Costner” <pooh@efga.org>
To: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: 8bedd47286119e841d6af3996962cac58837e4f40398af8904a4bb17d1f189dd
Message ID: <3.0.3.32.19980108162541.0371f1f0@mail.atl.bellsouth.net>
Reply To: <3.0.3.32.19980108004628.03b6bbe8@mail.atl.bellsouth.net>
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-08 22:29:13 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 06:29:13 +0800

Raw message

From: "Robert A. Costner" <pooh@efga.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 06:29:13 +0800
To: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: Remailers & N.E.T.
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19980108004628.03b6bbe8@mail.atl.bellsouth.net>
Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19980108162541.0371f1f0@mail.atl.bellsouth.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 12:47 PM 1/8/98 -0800, Tim May wrote:
>(Though the SPA and others may then go after the remailers. Ironically, the
>CDA exempted remailers--though not by name--from liability for messages.)

Unfortunately you are semi wrong here.  The CDA specifically does not cover
Intellectual property matters, and the SPA has consistently insisted that
the ISPs are liable for what their users do with copyrighted materials.


  -- Robert Costner                  Phone: (770) 512-8746
     Electronic Frontiers Georgia    mailto:pooh@efga.org  
     http://www.efga.org/            run PGP 5.0 for my public key






Thread