1998-01-28 - Re: Planetary rovers, SETI and other musings, was Re: update.356 (fwd)

Header Data

From: phelix@vallnet.com
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: ac297d6b655272790914720c45e37a47951269da48691551e2b451d01da14739
Message ID: <34cf7df6.1786526@128.2.84.191>
Reply To: <199801272132.PAA01922@einstein.ssz.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-28 19:24:45 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 03:24:45 +0800

Raw message

From: phelix@vallnet.com
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 03:24:45 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: Planetary rovers, SETI and other musings, was Re: update.356  (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199801272132.PAA01922@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <34cf7df6.1786526@128.2.84.191>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On 28 Jan 1998 12:24:30 -0600, Tim May <tcmay@got.net> wrote:

>I personally doubt that any flat spacetime topology (e.g., wormholes
>excepted) will admit any FTL signals. A lot of things would dramatically
>change if FTL communication existed...not the practical "communication"
>issues, which are human social minutiae, but issues about synchronization
>of reference frames and causality violations.

I remember seeing on one of those science specials on The learning channel
(or mabye the Discovery channel) that a professor did figure out
(accidentally) how to send information faster than light.  The only thing I
remember about it was the the signal was some kind of music.

I remember now, it was a special on time travel on a month ago.  Anybody
catch it?

-- Phelix






Thread