1998-01-19 - Re: Onion routing

Header Data

From: ulf@fitug.de (Ulf =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)
To: shamrock@cypherpunks.to
Message Hash: ad5147d6e0e3dc9910ad5be901d281f66fb5e7210f19ba713130a630f427dab4
Message ID: <9801191721.AA52458@public.uni-hamburg.de>
Reply To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980119102223.9263B-100000@pakastelohi.cypherpunks.to>
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-19 18:57:34 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 02:57:34 +0800

Raw message

From: ulf@fitug.de (Ulf =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 02:57:34 +0800
To: shamrock@cypherpunks.to
Subject: Re: Onion routing
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980119102223.9263B-100000@pakastelohi.cypherpunks.to>
Message-ID: <9801191721.AA52458@public.uni-hamburg.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



> Furthermore, it must be impossible to discern indiviual messages, meaning
> connections being opened or  closed. Which requires Pipenet, possibly the
> worst bandwidth burner ever  invented. :-)

With Onion Routing, eavesdroppers cannot see connections being opened
and closed, but all the Onion Routers do.

How is it done in Pipenet? 

Thread

• Return to January 1998

• Return to “Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>”
• Return to “Tim May <tcmay@got.net>”
• Return to “ulf@fitug.de (Ulf =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)”

• Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>”

• 1998-01-19 (Mon, 19 Jan 1998 09:39:19 +0800) - Onion routing - ulf@fitug.de (Ulf =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)
  • 1998-01-19 (Mon, 19 Jan 1998 17:33:53 +0800) - Re: Onion routing - Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>
    • 1998-01-19 (Tue, 20 Jan 1998 02:57:34 +0800) - Re: Onion routing - ulf@fitug.de (Ulf =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)
  • 1998-01-19 (Tue, 20 Jan 1998 03:22:42 +0800) - On the LAM–Local Area Mixes - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1998-01-19 (Tue, 20 Jan 1998 04:02:31 +0800) - RICO & Seizures (Was: Re: On the LAM–Local Area Mixes) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>