1998-01-11 - Re: rant on the morality of confidentiality (fwd)

Header Data

From: David Miller <dm0@avana.net>
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: fe8d5e5d828b8d7cd60f3c79c6ba2add8d21a3dc4b8b2ea0497f3b488b53c197
Message ID: <34B85EED.2D12492D@avana.net>
Reply To: <199801110603.AAA16499@einstein.ssz.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-11 05:59:26 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 13:59:26 +0800

Raw message

From: David Miller <dm0@avana.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 13:59:26 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: rant on the morality of confidentiality (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199801110603.AAA16499@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <34B85EED.2D12492D@avana.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



> ... If an art critic declines
> to publish something, its a loss probably only to his fellow art critics,
> but if a mathematician or a biologist or a physicist doesn't publish, it's
> a loss for more than just his colleagues.

The author has a skewed view which says that science is more important
than
art.  Simply not true.  Don't get too narrow a view of "progress".

--David Miller

middle  rival
devil rim lad

Windows '95 -- a dirty, two-bit operating system.

Thread

• Return to January 1998

• Return to “David Miller <dm0@avana.net>”
• Return to “dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)”

• Return to “Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>”

• 1998-01-11 (Sun, 11 Jan 1998 13:37:37 +0800) - Re: rant on the morality of confidentiality (fwd) - Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
  • 1998-01-11 (Sun, 11 Jan 1998 13:59:26 +0800) - Re: rant on the morality of confidentiality (fwd) - David Miller <dm0@avana.net>
    • 1998-01-11 (Mon, 12 Jan 1998 00:08:40 +0800) - Re: rant on the morality of confidentiality (fwd) - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
  • 1998-01-11 (Mon, 12 Jan 1998 00:06:31 +0800) - Re: rant on the morality of confidentiality (fwd) - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)