From: David Honig <honig@otc.net>
To: Anonymous <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 36735af890969e743862dbb2f84685a51a514d0bcc3ec7db9bce27c43fd6fd5f
Message ID: <3.0.5.32.19980218091525.007f8100@otc.net>
Reply To: <2d903692314a67a27cf3a173ba82fd9f@anon.efga.org>
UTC Datetime: 1998-02-18 18:05:35 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 02:05:35 +0800
From: David Honig <honig@otc.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 02:05:35 +0800
To: Anonymous <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re:
In-Reply-To: <2d903692314a67a27cf3a173ba82fd9f@anon.efga.org>
Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19980218091525.007f8100@otc.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 11:36 PM 2/17/98 -0500, Anonymous wrote:
>
>Here is description of my stream cipher, it operates one
>...
>...
>VB source code:
>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>------------------------------------------------------
>Who the hell uses VB of all languages - to write
>a crypto algorithm? And, which sane person uses
>MicroSucks Winduhz?
>
>
Forget the implementation language/platform bigotry.
The substantive issue is, Tell us what it is designed
to do *precisely*, and then tell us how it does it.
If it is claimed to be a "stream cipher" then it should do
certain things, e.g., produce incompressible data
from an input stream consisting of identical symbols.
Argue with logic, don't make us read your code.
------------------------------------------------------------
David Honig Orbit Technology
honig@otc.net Intaanetto Jigyoubu
Has Nike hired Monica to endorse kneepads yet?
Return to February 1998
Return to “David Honig <honig@otc.net>”