1998-02-07 - Most elegant wording against privacy/law-enforcement “balance”

Header Data

From: Information Security <guy@panix.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3b4f9c98986dc2771e479865b0f4f8e512c04fe6e9a7c7ed3135df24dd2cca33
Message ID: <199802070106.UAA01015@panix2.panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-02-07 01:34:11 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 7 Feb 1998 09:34:11 +0800

Raw message

From: Information Security <guy@panix.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 1998 09:34:11 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Most elegant wording against privacy/law-enforcement "balance"
Message-ID: <199802070106.UAA01015@panix2.panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



What are the most elegant rebuttals to politicians saying we
need Key Recovery as a "reasonable balance between the needs of
law enforcement vs. freedom of crypto"?

I wasn't too elegant in the Crypto Manifesto.
---guy

Thread

• Return to February 1998

• Return to “Information Security <guy@panix.com>”

• Return to “Tim May <tcmay@got.net>”

• 1998-02-07 (Sat, 7 Feb 1998 09:34:11 +0800) - Most elegant wording against privacy/law-enforcement “balance” - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-02-07 (Sat, 7 Feb 1998 10:25:02 +0800) - Re: Most elegant wording against privacy/law-enforcement “balance” - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>