From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 3b7325bf4eb3946d4f9459c075be03bab63d2ede16c434a9925c8c1540acd532
Message ID: <88b57910d1bea792655156201f962142@anon.efga.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-02-10 10:37:19 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 18:37:19 +0800
From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 18:37:19 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Driver Licenses
Message-ID: <88b57910d1bea792655156201f962142@anon.efga.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to> enlightened us with:
> On Mon, 9 Feb 1998, Tim May wrote:
> > If a U.S. Passport is not considered enough I.D.,
> > because it doesn't have the Big Brother Inside
> > magstripe, one walks away from the transaction.
>
> Just as a data point, in the State of Oregon, an US
> passport is *not* valid ID for alcohol purchases.
> Magstripe or no magstripe.
Of course not! The People's Socialist Nirvana of Oregon
is a foreign country. Just the fact that almost all
other foreign countries recognize the U.S. passport as
valid identification for things far more momentous than
the purchase of alcohol doesn't mean that the PSNofO
has to!
What do they require in Oregon? A little holographic
tatoo in paisley? A barcode on the tongue? Oh, I know!
A machine-readable ID on the inside of the rectum!
Has anyone figured out the obvious answer to this shit?
If you have, don't answer. And don't send me the bodies
by UPS collect, either.
Return to February 1998
Return to “Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>”
1998-02-10 (Tue, 10 Feb 1998 18:37:19 +0800) - Re: Driver Licenses - Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>