From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Message Hash: 482f3069e41144d2eae564c9d3c4abce0f42e23768c0adb78ec501050a4947bb
Message ID: <199802060335.VAA04271@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-02-06 04:12:57 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 12:12:57 +0800
From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 12:12:57 +0800
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Subject: Free-market monopolization features...
Message-ID: <199802060335.VAA04271@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
Hi,
This is the theory in its current working version:
An unregulated (free-market) economy will inherently monopolize when, but
not necessarily only if, the following are present:
- the market is saturated, in other words the number of consumers at
any given time are equal to or less than the service providers ability
to provide that service (or resource). This means the long-term survival
of firms is a function of retained market share and raw resource share
control/ownership.
- the technology and/or start-up costs are high in material and
intellectual factors. This minimizes the potential for new providers
to start up. Providers will also require non-disclosure and other
mechanisms to reduce sharing of information and cross-communications
except under controlled conditions. Expect an increase in certifications
and implimentation standards required to do business with the more
succesful of these providers.
- an individual or small group of service providers have a small but
distinct efficiency advantage in technology, manufacturing, or
marketing. Over a long-enough time this market advantage will grow
and as a result widen the 'technology gap' between firms.
- expect the most efficient firms to share their profit with the
critical intellectual contributors. This further reduces the
problem of cross-communication and new provider start-up.
- expect to see the more successful providers to join in co-ops with
the less succesful providers. This will be under the surreptitous
goal of 'developing technology'. It's actual goal will be to cause
these smaller firms to commit resources to such enterprises. As soon
as it is strategicaly advantagous the primary providers will break-off
the co-op. This has the effect of further reducing the ability of the
smaller providers to react in a timely manner to market changes or
develop new technology due to resource starvation.
- expect to see the less efficient providers to combine in an effort
to reap the benefits of shared market share and resources. Unless
this partnering provides a more efficient model and there is sufficient
time for that efficiency to develop these new providers will eventualy
fail or be joined with other providers.
- expect to see the primary provider buy those less efficient providers
that don't fail completely. These purchases will be as a result of
some new or unexpected technology that will significantly increase
the market share of the primary provider -or- it will be with the
goal of eliminating this secondary technology and forcing those
market shares to do without or use the primary providers technology.
____________________________________________________________________
| |
| The most powerful passion in life is not love or hate, |
| but the desire to edit somebody elses words. |
| |
| Sign in Ed Barsis' office |
| |
| _____ The Armadillo Group |
| ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA |
| /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ |
| .', |||| `/( e\ |
| -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate |
| ravage@ssz.com |
| 512-451-7087 |
|____________________________________________________________________|
Return to February 1998
Return to “Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>”
1998-02-06 (Fri, 6 Feb 1998 12:12:57 +0800) - Free-market monopolization features… - Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>