From: bill payne <billp@nmol.com>
To: kalliste@aci.net>
Message Hash: 5a1b81663aa39f97d882837b1e65f95724f3cfda32048ba981c7c7e0f17aa5fe
Message ID: <34EB9A94.42D4@nmol.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-02-19 02:50:12 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 10:50:12 +0800
From: bill payne <billp@nmol.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 10:50:12 +0800
To: kalliste@aci.net>
Subject: the Court's private encryption key
Message-ID: <34EB9A94.42D4@nmol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Wednesday 2/18/98 7:23 PM
J Orlin Grabbe
John Young
I just spoke with Bill Goldrick.
Read about Goldrick in Deep Black by William Burrows.
Goldrick was the Sandia supervisor who supervised installation
the Norwegian seismic system. And supervised the second
data authenticator. And reviewed my SAND report.
We talked about data authentication. And its problems.
I looked at Svet's February 10, 1998 ORDER
And thought about
Digital File Stamp
This document consists of an official stamp of the Court
and, if attached to the document identified above, servers an
endorsed copy of the pleading. It may be used in lieu of the Court's
mechanical file stamp for the named document only, and
misuse will be treated the same as misuse of the Court's official
mechanical file stamp. The Court's digital signature is a verifiable
mathematical computation unique to the filed document and the
Court's private encryption key. This signature assures
that any changes can be detected.
Think devious.
By way of deception.
But this for later.
Allahu Akbar
bill
Return to February 1998
Return to “bill payne <billp@nmol.com>”
1998-02-19 (Thu, 19 Feb 1998 10:50:12 +0800) - the Court’s private encryption key - bill payne <billp@nmol.com>