1998-02-24 - Re: Fight ECHELON while the topic is hot!

Header Data

From: “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
To: Information Security <guy@panix.com>
Message Hash: 5a586ae3c0489f76dd1a521f10e2e93731f5d01724432cf7c895e16c6491f924
Message ID: <199802241648.LAA15368@users.invweb.net>
Reply To: <199802241543.KAA18074@panix2.panix.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-02-24 16:15:22 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 08:15:22 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@invweb.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 08:15:22 -0800 (PST)
To: Information Security <guy@panix.com>
Subject: Re: Fight ECHELON while the topic is hot!
In-Reply-To: <199802241543.KAA18074@panix2.panix.com>
Message-ID: <199802241648.LAA15368@users.invweb.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Boundary..3989.1071713780.multipart/signed"

--Boundary..3989.1071713780.multipart/signed
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In <199802241543.KAA18074@panix2.panix.com>, on 02/24/98 
   at 10:43 AM, Information Security <guy@panix.com> said:

>Whooey!

>I'd say a number of senior people on this list are burnt
>out fighting the good fight.

>Did the government at least acknowledge it fucked up
>in the Weaver case to the tune of $3.1 million?

Nope, as a matter of fact the Administration was just arguing before the
SC that the murders in this case should not be held accountable.

>Didn't the person in charge, who Freeh promoted to
>second-in-command at the FBI, have his career destroyed?

One scapegoat and the organization goes on, business as usual. When I see
a 100,000 citizens storm the J.E.Hoover Building and drag that ratbastard
Freeh out by his heals then come back and tell us what a difference you
have made.

>Didn't the government finally back down on their
>attempt to legally kill the Unabomber?

So what? IMHO he should have been fried. Hell I'll even pay for the plane
ticket for him to come down here and meet 'ol sparky. :)

>Didn't the Pentagon Papers make it out?

What did it change? NOTHING

>Isn't ECHELON documented by person after person,
>including someone formerly in DOJ with top-secret
>clearance?

>Go for it!

>It is *you* who are advocating being a "sheeple"!!!

No not at all I just don't have any pie-in-the-sky daydreams that it will
mean squat! I have better things to do with my time than dealing with a
news media who's highest goal is to sell more tampons and toilet paper to
the sheeple.

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III  http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting    Cooking With Warp 4.0

Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html                        
---------------------------------------------------------------
 
Tag-O-Matic: Windws is ine for bckgroun comunicaions


--Boundary..3989.1071713780.multipart/signed
Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="pgp00004.pgp"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="pgp00004.pgp"
Content-Description: "PGP signature"

LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgTUVTU0FHRS0tLS0tClZlcnNpb246IDIuNi4zYS1z
aGExCkNvbW1lbnQ6IFJlZ2lzdGVyZWRfVXNlcl9FLVNlY3VyZV92MS4xYjFf
RVMwMDAwMDAKCmlRQ1ZBd1VBTlBMa1RZOUNvMW4rYUxoaEFRR1k0UVArSW1l
MndDSkhwcG5YMWQ5TTY2MVlmZUpKVzEzcXBrRVoKbGNoVUQ4RGpSbEtBbTgw
VjNPU0NOSWFtSmVZOHRTSERmSTNtQ0l4Qmg1Q2NZVkQ0a1ZkYTVLTEZ3cm1p
Q0h4NgpHREpSUkhIRW9KVHJuRk9HcnhNWWpvTWYvM2ovaTdicjQzUkQ2TnBD
NVlxcVQ5bXc3RnBYMVpUL3duYXhtbUhPCnZMYWNMemVXRWZNPQo9WTg0YQot
LS0tLUVORCBQR1AgTUVTU0FHRS0tLS0t
--Boundary..3989.1071713780.multipart/signed--




Thread