1998-02-12 - Re: “Corporations selling your ass down the road for a dollar”

Header Data

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: “Michael Sims” <declan@pathfinder.com>
Message Hash: 5bda5703181305bdd763303dc2ef591f2a2c0a75978f044fb069fa49eddb34ef
Message ID: <199802121659.LAA25269@mail1.panix.com>
Reply To: <v03007807b106593348bc@[168.161.105.216]>
UTC Datetime: 1998-02-12 16:59:25 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 08:59:25 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 08:59:25 -0800 (PST)
To: "Michael Sims" <declan@pathfinder.com>
Subject: Re: "Corporations selling your ass down the road for a dollar"
In-Reply-To: <v03007807b106593348bc@[168.161.105.216]>
Message-ID: <199802121659.LAA25269@mail1.panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 07:10 AM 2/12/98 -0400, Michael Sims wrote:

>Except, of course, that *businesses* count as individuals in a 
>libertarian world.  Yes, the corporation, that creation wholly of 
>government, becomes a sort of super-individual - and of course all 
>individuals are equal, but some are just a bit more equal.

Except that one does not need government to form a limited liability entity.  It was never necessary.  These days in particular with secret voting protocols and anonymous communications, it would be trivial to have a limited liability entity whose owners had no personal liability for organizational debts because they are unknown and unknowable.  Yet they can control the entity without losing their anonymity.  This was always possible.  Now it is easy.

In French corporations were originally called (pardon my spelling) "socit anonime".

Certainly as a cypherpunk, you believe in anonymous organizations.

>When I see a libertarian calling for an elimination of all forms of 
>corporations 

Certainly anarcho libertarians have always opposed government "incorporation" since they opposed government.

>and a return to sole proprietorships and straight 
>partnerships as the only form of business, then I'll know he's 
>ideologically consistent.  

What about Trusts, Companies of Adventurers, lots of other things...

>But very very little time complaining about the *existence* of 
>corporations whose primary function is to shield the important folks 
>who run and fund the corporation from the consequences of their 
>actions.  Come on!  This should be a primary offense!  Individuals 
>with no responsibility!

One can't impose responsibility on all.  Thus, I may be too poor to pay if you sue me.  So don't deal with me.  If you don't want to deal with an anonymous business entity, don't.

DCF







Thread