1998-02-16 - Re: bugged?

Header Data

From: “Thomas Junker” <tjunker@phoenix.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6e8b302bca0bd2b4ad3a43f081c6933f125d579267f65d6c6f105f23ca9f49af
Message ID: <199802162039.OAA12379@virtual5.c-com.net>
Reply To: <3.0.32.19980216081504.006a9e08@shell15.ba.best.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-02-16 20:39:27 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 12:39:27 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: "Thomas Junker" <tjunker@phoenix.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 12:39:27 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: bugged?
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19980216081504.006a9e08@shell15.ba.best.com>
Message-ID: <199802162039.OAA12379@virtual5.c-com.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On 16 Feb 98 at 8:16, x wrote:

> Could be wrong, but mine started beeping when ISP switched to new digital
> modems to support 56K.

Same here.  I assumed it was an answer burp for 56K,
followed by a momentary pause to see if the calling modem
responds and negotiates 56K.  Mine isn't, so after the 
pause the ISP modem puts up standard V.34 answer tone.





Thread