From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Message Hash: 84d9e0cc6ee57cff40e27aa7812032a54f42a02e2cb6fa2aa8cf81110e67240c
Message ID: <199802081806.MAA14516@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-02-08 18:05:00 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 9 Feb 1998 02:05:00 +0800
From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 1998 02:05:00 +0800
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Subject: Another Linus market observation...
Message-ID: <199802081806.MAA14516@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
Hi,
Another Linux market observation that would indicate that the total impact
of Linux is going to be less than what we as Linux supporters would want
is the literature that has arisen about Linux. In particular the count of
monthly magazines. Linux has a roughly 6M user market penetration yet there
is only a single Linux specific magazine available. In the comparative
markets of C64 and Amiga there were several (eg Amiga World, Info, Compute!)
magazines. Even today there are at least 3 Amiga magazines on the market yet
that machine hasn't been actively manufactured in over 2 years. Why is the
Linux magazine market limited to The Linux Journal? And what does that mean
for the long term strength of the market (and by extension the hurdles other
OS's would face in the future)?
____________________________________________________________________
| |
| The most powerful passion in life is not love or hate, |
| but the desire to edit somebody elses words. |
| |
| Sign in Ed Barsis' office |
| |
| _____ The Armadillo Group |
| ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA |
| /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ |
| .', |||| `/( e\ |
| -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate |
| ravage@ssz.com |
| 512-451-7087 |
|____________________________________________________________________|
Return to February 1998
Return to “Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>”