From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Message Hash: 87472bb02f4db5eaa397723af335df1f75591a7a970211d9c1dd7fe1e3cfb7f5
Message ID: <199802111428.IAA02962@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-02-11 14:25:26 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 22:25:26 +0800
From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 22:25:26 +0800
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Subject: Re: VanEck, Noise, & Palmtops... (fwd)
Message-ID: <199802111428.IAA02962@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
Forwarded message:
> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 22:08:06 -0800
> From: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
> Subject: Re: VanEck, Noise, & Palmtops...
> To defeat the integrating attacks you have described, you want to repeat
> the same noise frame after frame. It must be loud enough to swamp the
> signal going to the display, so the output of the integration is the noise
> and not the signal.
True, but then we aren't talking about standard PC's and monitors are we...
*NO* method of eavesdropping can't be defeated.
____________________________________________________________________
| |
| The obvious is sometimes false; |
| The unexpected sometimes true. |
| |
| Anonymous |
| |
| |
| _____ The Armadillo Group |
| ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA |
| /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ |
| .', |||| `/( e\ |
| -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate |
| ravage@ssz.com |
| 512-451-7087 |
|____________________________________________________________________|
Return to February 1998
Return to “Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>”
1998-02-11 (Wed, 11 Feb 1998 22:25:26 +0800) - Re: VanEck, Noise, & Palmtops… (fwd) - Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>