From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8edfc1842b29b513287bbaf733e503d2d26919f1a25a50dd95f7d59c1b029969
Message ID: <6c52fc4fbf1b77f88e3aeb3fffb90659@anon.efga.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-02-18 03:03:41 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 19:03:41 -0800 (PST)
From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 19:03:41 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <6c52fc4fbf1b77f88e3aeb3fffb90659@anon.efga.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>Doesn't the act of taking it across the border, in the laptop, constitute
>an act of export??
Well, yes it would, but the original scenario includes WRITING the code
outside of the US, which means it never was a US creation, even if the
creature that happened to be writing the code was native to the US.
The question is whether the dude could pull a stunt like this and get
away with it. I'd say go for it. You got a plausible loophole to a
stupid law that might not hold in court anyways.
-Anon
Return to February 1998
Return to “Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>”
1998-02-18 (Tue, 17 Feb 1998 19:03:41 -0800 (PST)) - No Subject - Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>