From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 95418f52193119e3f7bb931d98c5c10be09831d8bb7caa2f46ed3ef23cabf177
Message ID: <aR7Fke1w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <199802051634.KAA02262@einstein.ssz.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-02-06 01:16:38 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 09:16:38 +0800
From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 09:16:38 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: the best justice money can buy --Lessig (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199802051634.KAA02262@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <aR7Fke1w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com> writes:
>
> Forwarded message:
>
> > Date: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 08:23:58 -0800 (PST)
> > From: mark@unicorn.com
> > Subject: Re: the best justice money can buy --Lessig
>
> > Of course there's a free-market remedy for Microsoft; eliminate copyright.
> > anyone can copy Microsoft software for free, it would be forced to compete
> > on real benefits rather than installed base.
>
> If there were no copyright nobody would have any reason to market software
> or much else for that matter. I would predict that much of the technology
> and infrastructure we have now wouldn't exist. It would also stiffle
> creativity and new methodologies because there would be no profit in it to
> recoup development costs. Those who would survive in such a market would be
> the 800-lb gorillas because only they would have the resources to squash the
> smaller companies.
Software development seems to be thriving in countries that aren't very keen
on enforcing copyright laws - do you care to explain why?
>
> Free markets monopolize.
Hmm... There's no copyright on perfumes. There are market leaders in perfumes,
but no monopoly; hardly even an olygopoly.
---
Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps
Return to February 1998
Return to “Tim May <tcmay@got.net>”