From: “Brian B. Riley” <brianbr@together.net>
To: <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>
Message Hash: b77ab5ea3e7a8db20cbfabed5fe0dec6ce254f1a0c613178e5fbf1e739e3936a
Message ID: <199802092153.QAA07449@mx01.together.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-02-09 22:09:25 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 06:09:25 +0800
From: "Brian B. Riley" <brianbr@together.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 06:09:25 +0800
To: <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>
Subject: Re: Driver Licenses
Message-ID: <199802092153.QAA07449@mx01.together.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On 2/9/98 12:25 PM, Tim May (tcmay@got.net) passed this wisdom:
>Lucky is right that that "underage stings" are on the increase.
>Underage persons, often in high school, beome self-righteour
>warriors in the War On Demon Rum, and "narc out" their local
>shopkeepers.
As I write this there are advertisements up in the halls at the HS
(obviously with school blessings) where I teach (a few miles east of
Burlington, VT) specifically soliciting 17 year olds to work for a
private company under contract to the state to 'test buy' tobacco
products. I haven't heard about any takers yet nor anything backfiring.
>Hey, it would serve these junior narcs right if, upon being carded
>and being shown to be underage, a store owner made a citizen's
>arrest. Perhaps putting the perp in the back freezer for a few
>hours would send a message.
I wonder, though, how long it would go on if some shopkeeper indeed did
this? But, is it a crime to try to buy booze or tobacco underage, if you
do not try to show fraudulent indentification?
Brian B. Riley --> http://members.macconnect.com/~brianbr
For PGP Keys <mailto:brianbr@together.net?subject=Get%20PGP%20Key>
"He's not dead -- He's electroencephalographically challenged."
Return to February 1998
Return to ““Brian B. Riley” <brianbr@together.net>”