1998-02-18 - Stupid Law

Header Data

From: rdew@el.nec.com (Bob De Witt)
To: anon@anon.efga.org
Message Hash: d1db4baaf64f87a785f05f5fc2d71f9caeaf26edad338455c9f5025b38017631
Message ID: <199802180443.UAA12254@yginsburg.el.nec.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-02-18 05:14:31 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 21:14:31 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: rdew@el.nec.com (Bob De Witt)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 21:14:31 -0800 (PST)
To: anon@anon.efga.org
Subject: Stupid Law
Message-ID: <199802180443.UAA12254@yginsburg.el.nec.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Yes, it is.  Even if he wrote a program in Mexico, but carried his laptop
back and forth daily, each piece can come into the US, but cannot leave
again!  Uuuuuuuuummmmmmm, gooooood!  Read the actual documents.


Bob De Witt,
rdew@el.nec.com


> From anon@anon.efga.org Tue Feb 17 19:44:29 1998
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 22:08:26 -0500
> From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
> Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
> 	It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
> 	Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
> 	remailer administrator at <admin@anon.efga.org>.
> To: cypherpunks@toad.com
> 
> >Doesn't the act of taking it across the border, in the laptop, constitute
> >an act of export??
> 
> Well, yes it would, but the original scenario includes WRITING the code
> outside of the US, which means it never was a US creation, even if the
> creature that happened to be writing the code was native to the US.
> 
> The question is whether the dude could pull a stunt like this and get
> away with it. I'd say go for it. You got a plausible loophole to a
> stupid law that might not hold in court anyways.
> 
> -Anon
> 
> 
> 





Thread