1998-02-11 - Re: VanEck, Noise, & Palmtops…

Header Data

From: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
To: Jim Choate <cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Message Hash: ed380e16879775ea16a056c7c38935628ba67bc2b12e19e99d9b81c4bea8340f
Message ID: <v03110714b106f04e2ede@[207.94.250.77]>
Reply To: <199802101949.NAA05309@einstein.ssz.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-02-11 06:24:54 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 14:24:54 +0800

Raw message

From: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 14:24:54 +0800
To: Jim Choate <cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Subject: Re: VanEck, Noise, & Palmtops...
In-Reply-To: <199802101949.NAA05309@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <v03110714b106f04e2ede@[207.94.250.77]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 11:49 AM -0800 2/10/98, Jim Choate wrote:
>If you want to defeat Van Eck you want either very quite or you want lots of
>noise smoothly distributed across the rf spectrum.

To defeat the integrating attacks you have described, you want to repeat
the same noise frame after frame.  It must be loud enough to swamp the
signal going to the display, so the output of the integration is the noise
and not the signal.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz       | Market research shows the  | Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506     | average customer has one   | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | teat and one testicle.     | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA







Thread