From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 1224379ef16276a8a9ef3e9d4fe5a6545fe7779efe84a92b1e82d70f0a18e99b
Message ID: <1.5.4.32.19980306014415.0102aa64@pop.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-03-06 01:40:05 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:40:05 -0800 (PST)
From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:40:05 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Gun Grabbers in WASHINGTON -- Friday
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19980306014415.0102aa64@pop.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Anonymous wrote:
>
>8 a.m.-Noon. POWDER TAGGANTS - Conclusion of a two-day conference by a
>National Resarch Council committee examining the technical viability of
>and issues related to tagging black and smokeless powders.
> Location: National Academy of Sciences, 2100 C St. NW.
> Contact: 202-334-2138.
The New York Times reported today that the National Research
Council found that it was not feasible to require taggants in
explosives and recommended that the technology not be pursued.
Instead, it proposed improved licensing and protection of storage.
The panel noted that it would be very difficult to restrict access to
common materials for manufacturing explosives, and that law
enforcement should improve investigation, intelligence and
education of the public.
An unconfirmed Reuters is that the panelists fist-fought tooth-and-nail
gouch&suck-eyeballs over the issue of a confidential investigation to
determine why there were no ATF agents in Murrah, only the
head-hammered remains of all the agency's Wintel boxes choked
with endless incoming of "The Availability of Bombmaking Information
on the Internet" auto-forwarded from Senator_Feinstein@remailer.to.
Return to March 1998
Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”
1998-03-06 (Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:40:05 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Gun Grabbers in WASHINGTON – Friday - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>