1998-03-20 - Re: A little Paranoid, William?

Header Data

From: StanSquncr <StanSquncr@aol.com>
To: mgraffam@mhv.net
Message Hash: 2fdf1a56dce6f56d455160c23a9c8607f995444257605046887b658d92a368a4
Message ID: <e8d11de8.3512e4bc@aol.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-03-20 21:52:07 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 13:52:07 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: StanSquncr <StanSquncr@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 13:52:07 -0800 (PST)
To: mgraffam@mhv.net
Subject: Re: A little Paranoid, William?
Message-ID: <e8d11de8.3512e4bc@aol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In a message dated 98-03-19 18:21:57 EST, mgraffam@mhv.net writes:

<< I've heard it said 'Paranoia is reality on a finer scale.'
 
 I believe it.
 
 If you think that signing messages is paranoia, you may be right.. I,
 for one, _am_ paranoid. I know the practical attacks that can be made,
 and I've seen them work and, and demonstrated how easy they are.
 Worse, I've experienced them. Maybe you haven't .. and thats good.
 I hope your good luck continues. >>

Actually, my presence here amongst the cypherpunks is a direct RESULT of one
of those attacks.  But I can deal with it without getting paranoid.

And you might be correct about paranoia and reality.

Stan





Thread