1998-03-19 - Re: UPSs

Header Data

From: StanSquncr <StanSquncr@aol.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 55c7eda1ed4fbc9a2ef62e0aef12ec3c2ae56c682bd1f26111881fe31b6e5ba1
Message ID: <5b89711e.3510b439@aol.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-03-19 06:08:50 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 22:08:50 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: StanSquncr <StanSquncr@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 22:08:50 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: UPSs
Message-ID: <5b89711e.3510b439@aol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In a message dated 98-03-18 23:54:33 EST, spectre@anthrax.net writes:

<< ... Any decent ups will put the incoming power
 through a "conditioner" that will filter out noise in the incoming power,
 and rebuild the wave so that transient sags and spikes don't get through. ...
>>

BUT, even the fastest electronics cannot respond fast enough to the initial
spike, if that spike is too high in the first place (if your incoming power
lines get hit by lightning, for instance), it's already too late.  My
suggestion, don't trust a UPS to eliminate spikes, get it if you anticipate a
need for back-up power to shut down your system in case of black-out (and
screw the surge protectors, trust the filtering in your power supply to do
that for you.)

Stan





Thread