From: jim@mentat.com (Jim Gillogly)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c4d47bfbf4dc9fc02f49eb2df632f0bc1b813b21a203b6df01989bb9725e35dc
Message ID: <9803182246.AA29563@mentat.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-03-18 22:50:15 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 14:50:15 -0800 (PST)
From: jim@mentat.com (Jim Gillogly)
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 14:50:15 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: PRZ comments
Message-ID: <9803182246.AA29563@mentat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Somebody quoted PRZ's message about the NAI/PGP/TIS merger deal,
which puts to rest for now some of <my> concerns about the weird
juxtaposition of companies, anyway. He didn't address the
issue of NAI becoming a KRAP again.
Anonymous quoted:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
...
> announcement on this subject on 20 March at CeBit in Hannover Germany.
>
> -Philip Zimmermann
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
and then s/he said:
> I'm just curious, and no offense intended, but Phil's signature is
> bad in the signed message. I'm using PGP 5.55, and it has his key
> in it, and it doesn't check out. "Things that make you go 'hmmmmm'".......
Just a formatting problem. If you put a space before the "-Philip" the
message checks just fine. There are several other copies of the message
posted around the Web already with the correct formatting, and the other
one I checked had the spacing right already (which is how I knew where to
look on this copy). See, for example, the copy at http://jya.com .
Jim Gillogly
Return to March 1998
Return to “jim@mentat.com (Jim Gillogly)”
1998-03-18 (Wed, 18 Mar 1998 14:50:15 -0800 (PST)) - Re: PRZ comments - jim@mentat.com (Jim Gillogly)