From: jtatz@chemistry.ohio-state.edu
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f4575a0ba93a0cd47171a87451b94750bc79e69fdd871e3c2877bfd1adc44d97
Message ID: <350453B0.7E32@accessatlanta.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-03-09 22:32:28 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 14:32:28 -0800 (PST)
From: jtatz@chemistry.ohio-state.edu
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 14:32:28 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: RE: Crypto as contraband
Message-ID: <350453B0.7E32@accessatlanta.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> The morons in congress responded to intercepts of cellphones. Because
> Newt was scanned. Response: outlaw *cellphones*... which are
> themselves typically programmable as scanners of cell freqs. > And scanners
> and programmable RF receivers.
The ECPA (Electronic Communications Privacy Act) banned cell phone
scanning, as of 1994 I believe. When Newt was monitored, that was
nothing really new.
Ch 83, (890-986?) is cell, however Federal law (Title 18, Chapter 119)
makes cell monitoring illegal only if it INTENTIONAL. And owning and
buying cell-phone capable devices is LEGAL. The only catch is who is
selling it, it is my understanding you can sell a cell scanner used
without a prob. I currently own a cell-capable scanner.
~Jim
------------------------------------------
A great man named Ben Tersian once said
"Avoid the cliche 'Information must be free'"
"Find it learn it embrace it and set it free."
Return to March 1998
Return to “jtatz@chemistry.ohio-state.edu”
1998-03-09 (Mon, 9 Mar 1998 14:32:28 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Crypto as contraband - jtatz@chemistry.ohio-state.edu