From: “Brian B. Riley” <brianbr@together.net>
To: <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 1d3f427758f969c9ac1dea6b05dd6871fd9c9e45fdb26f074e531330bce9927a
Message ID: <199804220221.WAA28566@mx01.together.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-04-22 02:21:52 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 19:21:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Brian B. Riley" <brianbr@together.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 19:21:52 -0700 (PDT)
To: <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Position escrow
Message-ID: <199804220221.WAA28566@mx01.together.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On 4/21/98 7:33 PM, Mark Armbrust (marka@ff.com) passed this wisdom:
>At 03:08 PM 4/21/98 -0700, you wrote:
>>This is a really difficult issue. Even the most diehard cypherpunk
>>cannot doubt the usefulness of a cellular position reporting
>>capability in an emergency situation, when the user *wants* the cops
>>or whoever to know where he is. The big problem is how to keep it
>>from being used (or abused) for "law enforcement" purposes without the
>>consent of the user.
>
>Don't archive the information -- supply it as part of the CNID. If the
>user has disabled caller-ID don't supply the location info either.
>
>This depends on the integrity of the service provider and whether they have
>the balls to stand up against CALEA.
It seems to me that security dependent upon someone else's ethics/guts
or lack of them is no security at all.
Brian B. Riley --> http://members.macconnect.com/~brianbr
For PGP Keys <mailto:brianbr@together.net?subject=Get%20PGP%20Key>
"I tried sniffing Coke once, but the ice cubes got stuck in my nose."
Return to April 1998
Return to ““Brian B. Riley” <brianbr@together.net>”
1998-04-22 (Tue, 21 Apr 1998 19:21:52 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Position escrow - “Brian B. Riley” <brianbr@together.net>