1998-04-10 - RE: possible customer for a Forth box?

Header Data

From: “Bauer, Michael (C)(STP)” <michael.bauer@guidant.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 89e53c945c0abe2d893d5310e074437ef0e36d291a3ae21cbf42d4f6b7dab737
Message ID: <9D521B9EB85ED111B7F500A02461F692026E9E@stpmsx02.stp.guidant.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-04-10 18:36:14 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 11:36:14 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: "Bauer, Michael (C)(STP)" <michael.bauer@guidant.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 11:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: RE: possible customer for a Forth box?
Message-ID: <9D521B9EB85ED111B7F500A02461F692026E9E@stpmsx02.stp.guidant.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Greg Bailey [SMTP:greg@minerva.com]
> > Sent:	Thursday, April 09, 1998 9:23 PM
> > To:	'stuartj@packetengines.com'
> > Cc:	'ATHENA Tech'; 'ark-gvb'
> > Subject:	RE: possible customer for a Forth box?
> > 
> > On Thu, 9 Apr 1998 15:12:17 -0700, Stuart Johnson
> > <stuartj@packetengines.com> wrote:
> > 
> > >   i'm currently looking for a box or chipset that will encryption
> > > ethernet traffic at or near wire speed. does anyone know of such a
> > > thing?  anyhelp will be greatly appreciated.
> > 
> > We might be able to help, but the above is not a complete problem
> > statement.  It could be read as use of Ether for a point to point
> > connection between two machines with all traffic encrypted, which
> > is a nice and simple key management problem.  Or it might mean
> > two or more boxes plugged into an Ethernet with only traffic
> > between these pairs of boxes encrypted.  This is a much harder
> > key management problem and also is full of special cases such as
> > some protocols (ARP for example) that must never be encrypted.
> > 
> thanks all for the quick replies, for my needs a point to point
> connection is fine.
> 
> i've looked at a few things out there (netfortress, some bay routers)
> but they are all very slow, i'm looking for a wire speed
> implementation
> (100-1000Mb/s) is there anything out there in this arena? or do i have
> to make my own <g>.  if i were to embark on building my own is there
> any
> body of work out there that would help me get a jump start? i have the
> LAN protocol knowledge but my crypto knowledge is limited to what i've
> read in Schneier.
> 
Have you checked out RadGuard's cIPRO?  It claims throughput of 100 Mbps
and is IPSec-compliant, although I don't know which specific algorithms
it supports.  

Mick Bauer
Network Engineer, EXi Corp.





Thread