From: “=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jes=FAs?= Cea =?iso-8859-1?Q?Avi=F3n?=” <jcea@argo.es>
To: Mordechai Ovits <movits@syndata.com>
Message Hash: 06d43afe9349244ffaead48cdb320934de40e5cb2e290506e9e06af10edbf8ae
Message ID: <3557576A.C5EF9791@argo.es>
Reply To: <35571323.D109A0D2@argo.es>
UTC Datetime: 1998-05-11 17:57:18 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 10:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jes=FAs?= Cea =?iso-8859-1?Q?Avi=F3n?=" <jcea@argo.es>
Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 10:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
To: Mordechai Ovits <movits@syndata.com>
Subject: Re: Chaffing & winnowing without overhead
In-Reply-To: <35571323.D109A0D2@argo.es>
Message-ID: <3557576A.C5EF9791@argo.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> However clever this technique is (and it *is* clever), it defeats the
> original purpose of Ron's idea.
Yes, you are right, Mordechai. My point was:
a) Prove that you can implement chaffing & winnowing without
bandwidth overhead. I agree that the final schema doesn't
resemble C&W anymore :).
b) Prove that you can use signature schemes, strong and exportable,
to achieve confidentiality. In that way, my objetive is the same
that Rivest had.
I'm happy knowing I can use full strengh signatures to keep my secrets,
secret :)
> No plaintext is visible.
In the Rivest's paper you transmit, indeed, all the 2^n plaintexts for a
n bit length };-).
--
Jesus Cea Avion _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/
jcea@argo.es http://www.argo.es/~jcea/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/
PGP Key Available at KeyServ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"Things are not so easy" _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"My name is Dump, Core Dump" _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibnitz
Return to May 1998
Return to “Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>”