From: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
To: “Edwin E. Smith” <caj@math.niu.edu>
Message Hash: 7f3a58a6cfc52b7c81448a3ad2de3a73597811a9acf7d9948fe0113a481e5b7a
Message ID: <v0313030eb1742c877c4e@[209.66.100.124]>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980504173014.22503A-100000@baker>
UTC Datetime: 1998-05-05 02:43:29 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 19:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 19:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Edwin E. Smith" <caj@math.niu.edu>
Subject: Re: A new Swiss banking novel
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980504173014.22503A-100000@baker>
Message-ID: <v0313030eb1742c877c4e@[209.66.100.124]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 6:19 PM -0700 5/4/98, Edwin E. Smith wrote:
>I agree completely. While I support the right to own guns (and nukes)
>by anyone, guns can be used both ofensively and defensevely while
>crypto can only be used defensevely.
>
>That is unless you put PGP on a stack of diskettes, glue them
>together and whack somebody with them.
Sorry, but this is nonsense.
Crypto can and has been used just like any other weapon. The freedom
fighters in Burma who use PGP to communicate securely and to plan bombings
against their oppressors...how can this be said to be "only defensive"?
I've said this many times, so I won't spend more time here. All "defensive"
weapons have "offensive" uses. Even shields, even armor, even crypto.
To think otherwise is to show no awareness of history.
--Tim May
"The tree of liberty must be watered periodically with the blood of
tyrants...."
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
ComSec 3DES: 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Licensed Ontologist | black markets, collapse of governments.
Return to May 1998
Return to “Xcott Craver <caj@math.niu.edu>”